CLST 273H: Classical Tragedy
Spring Semester 2002
Dr. Jacqueline Long
Writing Assignment 1
Goals
- To read and assess a professional scholar's published ideas about
Aeschylus's Oresteia (a focus to start with, but you'll also see
that elements in these arguments apply to other plays too)
- To test these ideas against your own reading of the Oresteia
- either in a passage the scholar analyzes in the article you read, or
in a different passage you feel raises related questions
- To demonstrate, in a concrete, specific, well-argued essay, where
the scholar's ideas illuminate important aspects of the play you
choose, and where those ideas can be improved on for an even better
picture of what Aeschylus's trilogy is doing
Articles to consider - pick one
Articles and books in Cudahy Reserves.
- Simon Goldhill, Reading Greek Tragedy, "The Drama of
Logos," ch. 1, 1-32 (Cambridge UP 1986) - book on reserve.
- John Heath, "Disentangling the Beast: Humans and Other Animals in
Aeschylus' Oresteia," Journal of Hellenic Studies 119
(1999) 17-47 - photocopy on reserve.
- Froma I. Zeitlin, "The Dynamics of Misogyny: Myth and Mythmaking in
Aeschylus's Oresteia," Arethusa 11 (1978) 149-84; rpt. in
Women in the Ancient World: The Arethusa Papers, ed. John
Peradotto and J. P. Sullivan, 159-94 (SUNY Press 1984); rpt. in
Zeitlin, Playing the Other: Gender and Society in Classical Greek
Literature, ch. 3, 87-119 (UChicago Press 1996) - it's Zeitlin,
Playing the Other that's on reserve.
To hand in at the start of class Wednesday, 6 February
In 4-6 typed, double-spaced pages:
- Identify the article you have chosen to focus on, and briefly
summarize its central argument - do not spend more than one page
total in your paper on mere summary! the
important part of this essay is your
analysis and well-supported critique
- Show how the scholar's views can be supported from the play and
passages you have chosen to focus on - go beyond quotation or
paraphrase to show what additional
insights you can build on the scholar's
work
- If the play you have chosen can be better understood by modifying
the scholar's views, show why and
how the argument can be modified to make
it work even better
- Support your observations and suggestions by referring to specific,
concrete passages of evidence in the play you're working on, and
explaining how these passages help confirm your points
- For suggestions about pulling an essay together, see Dr. Long's
Guide to Writing
Papers
BACK to CLST 273H Schedule of
Readings and Assignments
This file last updated 27 January 2002 by
jlong1@orion.it.luc.edu.
http://www.luc.edu/depts/classics/